
I don't know that I would consider The Historian to be a thriller as much as a suspenseful mystery. I love that the author avoids using explicit blood and gore and uses her writing to build the suspense rather than relying on the shock factor. Hitchcock could do wonders with this book. If you're wanting a fast pace, this may not be the best book for you, but, regardless of the slow pace, I was intrigued through the entire novel. My one complaint is that the ending, which a shock, seemed somewhat anticlimactic. After almost 700 pages of buildup, I would have liked a little more to happen with the ending, but it wasn't enough to turn me off the book altogether. It fit the storyline and the author's style well. Definitely recommend it to anyone who loves suspense!
What you mean vampires don't sparkle??????????? i am so upset. ;) Sounds like a good one.
ReplyDeleteYeah, this waaaay pre-dated the vampire craze, and in fact, was more caught up in the Da Vinci Code, historical intrigue/mystery craze. But not a bad read - and I totally and completely agree that the ending was a bit of a let down. Great writing, though!
ReplyDeleteI had to start this one twice for just that reason: When I realized it was a vampire book I gave it up. I'm glad I picked it back up though because once I got into it, I was surprised at how much I liked it. Glad you enjoyed this one too!
ReplyDelete